No.
5 smells damned juicy—it has ample notes of grapefruit and tropical
fruit on display, along with a waft of hoppiness. As juicy as the aroma
might be, though, the flavour outdoes it, with fresh-squeezed OJ notes,
along with peach and other, more tropical leanings. The downside of all
of that fruit focus is that, when combined with the elevated booze
content, this beer is mighty sweet—very nearly too sweet. There is a
welcome uptick of bitterness at the finish, but it isn’t quite enough to
provide the balance and grittiness I wanted.
As
I said, IPA No. 5 is an ambitious addition to the series. To use a
baseball metaphor in February seems sacrilege, but here goes: this beer
took a mighty cut, aiming at the fences, but ended up with a long single.
In short, it could have been better, but it a world where professional
ball players fail to reach base more that 70% of the time, a single is a pretty solid result.
Rating: 7.0 out of 10.
What is wrong with sweetness... conditioned to expect non-sweetness, we judge based on experience. Perhaps we can begin to categorize 'sweet' beers and then judge on that expectation.
ReplyDeleteGreat point! Really, I rate according to my own personal preferences and expectations on the style. I don't think that there is anything "wrong" with sweet beers, but I don't love sweetness in IPAs. But again, that's just me.
Delete